|
Rules
May 13, 2007 12:09:33 GMT -4
Post by ~$~APW/JTL Admin~$~ on May 13, 2007 12:09:33 GMT -4
The rules have recently been updated. Are there any rules you feel need to be added to the current ones? Any problems you may have with the current ones? This is an open forum. You may voice your opinion without fear of suspension/banishment. We are here to listen to YOU, the members. Please give feedback. Thank You!
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 3:02:04 GMT -4
Post by pornstar on May 17, 2007 3:02:04 GMT -4
I dig the probation outtie rule.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 9:18:10 GMT -4
Post by Brandon on May 17, 2007 9:18:10 GMT -4
Could we be a little less strict with the "Finisher" Rule ? Like for example: "5" people can only have the "Show Stopper" finisher and after that number is reached. The move is locked and cannot be used by others. No matter if that move is used as a Primary or Secondary.
I just think with this rule in place. You could still have it to where you don't have everybody using the same finisher. But also at the same time. Create a little more freedom for the new members that join.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:02:29 GMT -4
Post by Casey Angel on May 17, 2007 10:02:29 GMT -4
As always, we will take the suggestions into considertion and discuss them next time we meet. Any thoughts/opinions that do not berate any members are appreciated.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:35:53 GMT -4
Post by dayna on May 17, 2007 10:35:53 GMT -4
A member filteration proccess. Who know what kinda of sickos, weird and just straight up tards we could be getting in here. For the safety of us all, i vote for immgration laws.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:37:14 GMT -4
Post by King Vegas on May 17, 2007 10:37:14 GMT -4
A member filteration proccess. Who know what kinda of sickos, weird and just straight up tards we could be getting in here. For the safety of us all, i vote for immgration laws. Damn I love this girl. Should I set the wedding date Ms. Mariano? lol
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:47:36 GMT -4
Post by Nicole Storm on May 17, 2007 10:47:36 GMT -4
No spamming in this topic
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:52:14 GMT -4
Post by Katanna Jade on May 17, 2007 10:52:14 GMT -4
A member filteration proccess. Who know what kinda of sickos, weird and just straight up tards we could be getting in here. For the safety of us all, i vote for immgration laws. Damn I love this girl. Should I set the wedding date Ms. Mariano? lol Excuse me Vegas but after that night we spent together at my place I distinctly remember you saying that you were going to marry me as a girl with my talents was not one to let go. I hope you realize I'm not the sort to share, and like my name sake I can be both beautiful and deadly.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:53:51 GMT -4
Post by King Vegas on May 17, 2007 10:53:51 GMT -4
Ms. Casey Angel can we lock this topic please?
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 10:57:32 GMT -4
Post by dayna on May 17, 2007 10:57:32 GMT -4
Hey Vegas lets go see the veiw atop the tower again.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:01:59 GMT -4
Post by Kimberly Masters on May 17, 2007 11:01:59 GMT -4
[glow=green,2,300]This topic is for suggestions to improve the rules. It isn't made for spamming, so please stay on topic.[/glow]
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:16:29 GMT -4
Post by King Vegas on May 17, 2007 11:16:29 GMT -4
Point taken Ms. Masters, as I do have something I'd like to bring to the forefront for discussion. It's considering the rematch clause thing basically. What exactly are the rules concerning such things? Is there a time limit for how long a person can wait to use this "clause"? Because I personally don't think you should be able to use one if more than a week has passed.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:30:31 GMT -4
Post by Katanna Jade on May 17, 2007 11:30:31 GMT -4
Ah yes the rematch clause. I believe that they should be given two shows to use or lose the option. I say this because in the case of Mr. Bruiser a rematch this week wasn't an option due to the tag title match with Pandora's Box having been pre booked prior to his loss to Cinder and Liz Michaels. With two shows this would give Mr. Bruiser a chance to use the rematch option. Now on that note though should the person who won the titles in this case Cinder and Liz lose them then I say the rematch is gone as well as it no longer really is a rematch at that point.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:38:02 GMT -4
Post by Casey Angel on May 17, 2007 11:38:02 GMT -4
It sounds like the rules need updated and the Rematch Clause needs added. Thanks for the reminder!
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:39:12 GMT -4
Post by ca on May 17, 2007 11:39:12 GMT -4
Something I'd like to point out. In the case of Cinder and Liz, if they go so many title defenses(lets say, 6) and lose them, I think it's only fair that they recieve another rematch clause simply because of the amount of successful defenses that they have managed to gain. In the case of Cinder and Nathan, had we not gained as much defenses as we did, I don't think I would of been as adamant on a rematch.
|
|
Joe Bruiser
Status Unknown
First Ever APW Triple Crown Champion APW World Champion
2 Hits is all it takes, 1 hitting your jaw and you hitting the floor.
Posts: 423
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 11:59:10 GMT -4
Post by Joe Bruiser on May 17, 2007 11:59:10 GMT -4
I'm agreeing with Genesis on what he said. I do admit we need this Special move rule, but for the newcomers that come in later on and all of the good moves will be taken and they will have to change theres to a shitty special move which isn't fair to them at all. I definitely say its worth looking into to change it around a bit. I'm all for the rematch clause for only the next week unless like you said Katanna, if someone like Pandora's box was already given the shot then the rematch clause should be moved to the week after that, but I will have to disagree with you on the thing about if the tag champs lose the title belts you don't get your rematch clause. Whats the point of a rematch clause then? I say that one team should still get it 2 weeks later even if the reigning tag champs lose.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 12:01:08 GMT -4
Post by King Vegas on May 17, 2007 12:01:08 GMT -4
I agree about the rematch clause. It should be used within two weeks of losing said title. The finisher thing? I ain't feeling it at all. And damn sure ain't trying to share my snake eyes finisher either lol EDIT: BUT...I could see it happening IF the person AGREED to share their finisher. Even though I wouldn't...But to each his PWN I guess!
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 12:21:50 GMT -4
Post by Katanna Jade on May 17, 2007 12:21:50 GMT -4
The problem I see with sharing finishers is this. How often do you really see two or more people using the same finisher in a wrestling promotion. Not to mention then we have everyone wanting certain moves only because they do 20 plus damage not because of how it fits there wrestler. Personally I say there are plenty of good moves for finishers still going unused because they don't do uber damage and things should be left as is in this respect.
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 12:29:25 GMT -4
Post by King Vegas on May 17, 2007 12:29:25 GMT -4
Precisely! That's why I ain't trying to share my shit...I've said that...Once before haven't I? lol
|
|
|
Rules
May 17, 2007 12:33:03 GMT -4
Post by dayna on May 17, 2007 12:33:03 GMT -4
The problem I see with sharing finishers is this. How often do you really see two or more people using the same finisher in a wrestling promotion. Not to mention then we have everyone wanting certain moves only because they do 20 plus damage not because of how it fits there wrestler. Personally I say there are plenty of good moves for finishers still going unused because they don't do uber damage and things should be left as is in this respect. I like her.
|
|