|
|
Post by Yuki Kenzo on Jun 11, 2007 3:20:55 GMT -4
I would like to see some kind of restriction or better said a time for new members to show that they are captable of to RP and be active. To prove that they are able to handle their charakters.
At the moment is it that way when a new member joins that he can chose a Primary and Secondary finisher. If the Primary Finisher that he chose is already a secondary finisher of an already well known member then this member has to change his move. So what I want to say is quite easy. We could create a limit time, 1 month maybe after the first RP of the new member, where he can show that he truly wants to be a part of APW. We all know that from time to time people join that think at first it is cool to be here, but then decide to leave without a word.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Warrington Steele on Jun 11, 2007 3:26:43 GMT -4
Actually this isn't such a bad idea. *Ponders*
|
|
|
|
Post by Jessie Blair on Jun 11, 2007 3:32:58 GMT -4
The idea is simple...new member joins and wants to use Primary finisher that somebody has as secondary....
Old member doesn't have to change its Secondary till new member has proven that he is active enough. This means the old member has more time to look at a good replacment and if the new member fails ....the old member has not the problem to switch its finisher a few time
|
|
|
|
Post by blondeambition on Jun 11, 2007 9:04:29 GMT -4
I actually think this is a pretty decent idea to incorporate into APW. I can see this helping out a lot in those cases Miss Kenzo speaks of when people join and then suddenly up and leave. I think the staff should consider this one most definitely.  |
|
|
|
Post by Yuki Kenzo on Jun 11, 2007 9:12:21 GMT -4
Thank you Kaley
|
|
|
|
Post by blondeambition on Jun 11, 2007 9:14:36 GMT -4
You're welcome Miss Kenzo. Just don't get too excited and grab my ass or anything like last time.  |
|
|
|
Post by Yuki Kenzo on Jun 11, 2007 9:19:47 GMT -4
*whispers to herself* ....Damn it, she can read my mind....
Well gotta hope that the angels like that idea. Another thing I would take a look at is the primary finisher rule. I know there is another post which stated that already but I want to repeat it.
I think it wouldn't be a problem if more then 1 max 2 people are using the same primary finisher.....so for example 1 woman and 1 man can have the same primary finiher for example....but the above 18 finishers should keeped looked to the current users
|
|
|
|
Post by Yuki Kenzo on Jun 28, 2007 18:22:16 GMT -4
Yuki bump that as she still wants to know what people are thinking about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by pornstar on Jun 28, 2007 18:30:32 GMT -4
Jason says do it. And has made it so. Choose away, Angel's can thank me for making the 1337 Pwnnin' decision later.  |
|
Stacie Wilson
Status Unknown
Soon to be Mrs. Stacie Helms
Posts: 392
|
Post by Stacie Wilson on Jul 6, 2007 2:02:17 GMT -4
I have an idea that is similar to this...like making a rule that if a more active member wants the primary finisher of a Less active one as a secondary that could happen if it is not an uber.
|
|
Sarah Andrews-Cross
Status Unknown
APW Rose Champion
Professional Wrestling's "Iron Rose"
Posts: 834
|
Post by Sarah Andrews-Cross on Jul 6, 2007 2:05:17 GMT -4
I have an idea that is similar to this...like making a rule that if a more active member wants the primary finisher of a Less active one as a secondary that could happen if it is not an uber. *wonders who Stacie is talking about* |
|
